Given we’ve elsewhere discussed whether the District is a “criminal syndicate,” and that the definition consists of “engaging in racketeering activit(ies)” consisting of “at least two (2) crimes related to racketeering,” here we examine whether the District has committed “crimes related to racketeering?” And if so, which ones?

Although NRS 207.360 lists as many as thirty-seven (37) potential crimes related to racketeering, here we concentrate on the lesser number which in a vacuum conceivably apply to IVGID:

“The commission of, attempt to commit or conspiracy to commit any of the following crimes…

       8.   (Taking Property From Another Under Circumstances Amounting to) Robbery;

       9.   Taking Property From Another Under Circumstances Not Amounting to Robbery…

      18.  Grand Larceny…

      27.  Embezzlement of Money…Valued at $650 or More…

      28.  Obtaining…Money…Valued at $650 or More…by Means of False Pretenses(; and…)

      35.  Any Violation of NRS 205.377 (Multiple Transactions Involving Fraud or Deceit in The Course of an Enterprise).”

Taking Property From Another Under Circumstances Amounting to Robbery¹:

Taking Property From Another Under Circumstances Not Amounting to Robbery²:

Grand Larceny³:

Embezzlement⁴ of Money Valued at $650 or More: and,

Any Violation of NRS 205.377⁵:

And now you know!

---

1. For a definition of the term, the reader is directed to our What is Robbery discussion.
2. For a definition of the violation, the reader is directed to our What is Taking Property From Another Not Amounting to Robbery discussion.
3. For a definition of the term, the reader is directed to our What is Grand Larceny discussion.
4. For a definition of the term, the reader is directed to our What is Embezzlement discussion.
5. For a definition of the violation, the reader is directed to our What is a NRS 205.377 discussion.