Because the RFF/BFF do not satisfy the minimum requisites for a legitimate “fee,” as we’ve elsewhere demonstrated, they do not qualify as “rates, tolls or charges…for services or facilities furnished by the district.” Nevertheless, let’s assume arguendo the RFF/BFF can … Continue reading →
“Consciousness of guilt,” at least in California, “refers to conduct that may show a defendant was aware of his or her guilt.” In criminal law, “prosecutors frequently use it to argue that a defendant’s own behavior points toward wrongdoing.”1 There … Continue reading →
Because the RFF/BFF do not satisfy the minimum requisites for a legitimate “fee,” as we’ve elsewhere demonstrated, they do not qualify as “charges for the availability of service.” Nevertheless, let’s assume arguendo the RFF/BFF can be “fees.” Here we address … Continue reading →
Because the RFF/BFF do not satisfy the minimum requisites for a legitimate “fee,” as we’ve elsewhere demonstrated, they do not qualify as “charges for the availability of” facilities. Nevertheless, let’s assume arguendo the RFF/BFF can be “fees.” As we’ve elsewhere … Continue reading →
Why do we ask this question? Because NRS 318.515 instructs that where “a [general improvement district (“GID”)] of which (its) board of county commissioners (“County Board”) is not the (GID’s) board of trustees is not being properly managed…upon notification by … Continue reading →
No they cannot. And here are the reasons why. As we’ve demonstrated elsewhere, “each year, the District establishes…annual Recreation…and Beach Facility Fee(s)…collected from property owners within the District through a levy placed on the(ir) property tax bill(s)…As part of the … Continue reading →